jmorse wrote: (Note that I've merged main into this branch for various reasons,)
I've adjusted `adoptDbgValues` to always clean up the `DPMarker` that it adopts, so that there's no return value for people to accidentally miss. This means that we have to test in `adoptDbgValues` whether we're adopting something from a trailing-DPMarker position, and clean that up too, rather than relying on the caller to do that. (I suppose this is a classic case of premature optimisation) https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79345 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
