================
@@ -116,8 +116,7 @@ define void @test_widen(ptr noalias %a, ptr readnone %b) #4
{
; TFA_INTERLEAVE-NEXT: [[TMP18:%.*]] = getelementptr inbounds i64, ptr
[[TMP15]], i64 [[TMP17]]
; TFA_INTERLEAVE-NEXT: call void @llvm.masked.store.nxv2i64.p0(<vscale x 2
x i64> [[TMP13]], ptr [[TMP15]], i32 8, <vscale x 2 x i1> [[ACTIVE_LANE_MASK]])
; TFA_INTERLEAVE-NEXT: call void @llvm.masked.store.nxv2i64.p0(<vscale x 2
x i64> [[TMP14]], ptr [[TMP18]], i32 8, <vscale x 2 x i1> [[ACTIVE_LANE_MASK2]])
-; TFA_INTERLEAVE-NEXT: [[INDEX_NEXT:%.*]] = add i64 [[INDEX]], [[TMP6]]
-; TFA_INTERLEAVE-NEXT: [[INDEX_NEXT4]] = add i64 [[INDEX]], [[TMP6]]
+; TFA_INTERLEAVE-NEXT: [[INDEX_NEXT]] = add i64 [[INDEX]], [[TMP6]]
----------------
ayalz wrote:
Only implication visible in existing tests below is cse'ing of the Canonical IV
bump when active lane masks are used. Would other test(s) be relevant?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80271
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
