EricWF marked 10 inline comments as done.
EricWF added inline comments.
================
Comment at: lib/Sema/SemaCoroutine.cpp:237-244
+static UnresolvedSet<16> lookupOperatorCoawaitCall(Sema &SemaRef, Scope *S,
+ SourceLocation Loc,
+ Expr *E) {
UnresolvedSet<16> Functions;
SemaRef.LookupOverloadedOperatorName(OO_Coawait, S, E->getType(), QualType(),
Functions);
+ return Functions;
----------------
ABataev wrote:
> Maybe it is better to add an argument `UnresolvedSetImpl &OpCandidates`?
This seems like the best place to specify the concrete type now that everything
else uses `UnresolvedSetImpl`.
================
Comment at: lib/Sema/SemaCoroutine.cpp:301
+ SourceLocation Loc, StringRef Name,
+ MutableArrayRef<Expr *> Args) {
+ assert(Coroutine->CoroutinePromise && "no promise for coroutine");
----------------
ABataev wrote:
> Why do you need `MutableArrayRef<Epr *>`, when `ArrayRef<Expr *>` is enough?
> Also `buildMemberCall` must be changed
`Sema::ActOnCallExpr` requires the `MutableArrayRef`, so I don't see how this
can be changed.
================
Comment at: lib/Sema/SemaCoroutine.cpp:331
+ExprResult
+Sema::BuildCoawaitDependentExpr(SourceLocation Loc, Expr *E,
+ const UnresolvedSet<16> &Candidates) {
----------------
ABataev wrote:
> s/BuildCoawaitDependentExpr/buildCoawaitDependentExpr/g
Why? Every similar function uses a leading capital.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D26057
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
