================
@@ -40,8 +40,12 @@ static const Expr *ignoreTransparentExprs(const Expr *E) {
switch (E->getStmtClass()) {
case Stmt::OpaqueValueExprClass:
- E = cast<OpaqueValueExpr>(E)->getSourceExpr();
- break;
+ if (const clang::Expr *SE = cast<OpaqueValueExpr>(E)->getSourceExpr()) {
+ E = SE;
+ break;
+ } else {
+ return E;
+ }
----------------
bolshakov-a wrote:
Thanks! `else` doesn't make sense, indeed.
But it should be noted that `SE` refers to the result of `->getSourceExpr()`
and not to the result of `cast<OpaqueValueExpr>(E)`, hence its type is not a
pointer to `OpaqueValueExpr`. Doesn't LLVM policy insist on the explicit type
in such cases? Nevertheless, `clang::` qualification is redundant.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79764
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
