================
@@ -73,68 +83,89 @@ FileHeader:
Sections:
- Name: .text.foo
Type: SHT_PROGBITS
- Address: [[FOO_ADDR]]
+ Address: 0x4000
Flags: [SHF_ALLOC, SHF_EXECINSTR]
- Content: '503b0505200000907d02ebf5c3'
+ Content: '503b0505300000907d08ebf50f8dee1f0000c3'
- Name: .text.bar
Type: SHT_PROGBITS
- Address: [[BAR_ADDR]]
+ Address: 0x5000
Flags: [SHF_ALLOC, SHF_EXECINSTR]
Content: '5089d0740231f6e8f4ffffffc3'
+ - Name: .text.split
+ Type: SHT_PROGBITS
+ Address: 0x6000
+ Flags: [SHF_ALLOC, SHF_EXECINSTR]
+ Content: 'c3'
- Name: .data
Type: SHT_PROGBITS
Flags: [SHF_ALLOC, SHF_WRITE]
- Address: 0x6000
+ Address: 0x7000
- Name: .llvm_bb_addr_map.foo
Type: SHT_LLVM_BB_ADDR_MAP
Link: .text.foo
Entries:
- Version: 2
- Address: [[FOO_ADDR]]
- BBEntries:
- - ID: 3
- AddressOffset: 0x0
- Size: 0x1
- Metadata: 0x1
- - ID: 1
- AddressOffset: 0x0
- Size: 0x6
- Metadata: 0x0
- - ID: 2
- AddressOffset: 0x1
- Size: 0x4
- Metadata: 0x0
- - ID: 5
- AddressOffset: 0x0
- Size: 0x1
- Metadata: 0x2
+ Feature: 0x8
+ BBRanges:
+ - BaseAddress: 0x4000
+ BBEntries:
+ - ID: 3
+ AddressOffset: 0x0
----------------
boomanaiden154 wrote:
Why do all of these BBs except for one have an address offset of zero? The
symbolization seems fine, but given the address offset is relative to the base
address of the range, it seems like these should all map to the same object?
Unless the code in `yaml2obj` automatically takes into account the size and the
AddressOffset is additional?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74128
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
