erichkeane wrote:

> > This brings me to conclusion that hand-written style of codegen tests 
> > presented above is a better fit for purposes of C++ defect report codegen 
> > tests.
> 
> I share that conclusion. I think the hand-written IR is easier for people to 
> reason because it strips out unrelated details that make the test somewhat 
> more brittle than it needs to be for DR testing. I agree that we should use 
> the script whenever possible, but DR testing is a bit different from typical 
> codegen testing IMO. So I'm fine with the hand-crafted IR unless I'm missing 
> something.

Agreed, I find that using the script makes the tests WAY too fragile and hides 
the important parts of the test.  I DISAGREE we should use the script when 
possible, as I basically never see a time where it improves a CFE test.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77637
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to