bwendling wrote: > > @kees, the issue should be fixed with the newest push. > > Nice! This is so extremely close. It fixed all but 1 instance in the torture > testing. The remaining seems to be union order sensitive. O_o This > arrangement still reports non-zero for the `int count_bytes` one, unless I > move it below the `signed char count_ints` counter:
This is due to it being a union. There's more than one field with a `counted_by` attribute, and we just use the first one we see...and importantly it's type. This obviously isn't correct and I can fix it. However, it does bring up an issue that I *don't* know how to fix. If you have something like: ``` printf("%zu\n", __builtin_dynamic_object_size(mi, 1)); ``` we don't know out of hand whether to use the `count_bytes` or `count_ints` field to get the object size. I suggest in that case we should probably throw up our hands and give up. Thoughts? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76348 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits