llvmbot wrote:

<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT-->

@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang

Author: None (Alcaro)

<details>
<summary>Changes</summary>

(Yes, this commit is two years old, I never felt like investigating Phabricator)

---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65688.diff


1 Files Affected:

- (modified) clang/docs/Block-ABI-Apple.rst (+1-1) 


``````````diff
diff --git a/clang/docs/Block-ABI-Apple.rst b/clang/docs/Block-ABI-Apple.rst
index e21a8b68b5cd13..250d198ba6181b 100644
--- a/clang/docs/Block-ABI-Apple.rst
+++ b/clang/docs/Block-ABI-Apple.rst
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ The following flags bits are in use thusly for a possible 
ABI.2010.3.16:
 In 10.6.ABI the (1<<29) was usually set and was always ignored by the runtime -
 it had been a transitional marker that did not get deleted after the
 transition. This bit is now paired with (1<<30), and represented as the pair
-(3<<30), for the following combinations of valid bit settings, and their
+(3<<29), for the following combinations of valid bit settings, and their
 meanings:
 
 .. code-block:: c

``````````

</details>


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65688
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to