================
@@ -2164,6 +2164,12 @@ bool Driver::HandleImmediateArgs(const Compilation &C) {
return false;
}
+ if (C.getArgs().hasArg(options::OPT_print_library_module_manifest_path)) {
+ llvm::outs() << "module: ="
----------------
mathstuf wrote:
I'd like there to be some distinction between "modules not present because
Clang was built without them" and "modules not present but expected to be
there" (maybe distro packagers split things and the modules package is
missing?).
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76451
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
