================ @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@ +//===--- ReturnExpressionInVoidFunctionCheck.cpp - clang-tidy -------------===// +// +// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions. +// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information. +// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception +// +//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// + +#include "ReturnExpressionInVoidFunctionCheck.h" +#include "clang/AST/Stmt.h" +#include "clang/ASTMatchers/ASTMatchFinder.h" +#include "clang/ASTMatchers/ASTMatchers.h" + +using namespace clang::ast_matchers; + +namespace clang::tidy::readability { + +void ReturnExpressionInVoidFunctionCheck::registerMatchers( + MatchFinder *Finder) { + Finder->addMatcher( + returnStmt(hasReturnValue(hasType(voidType()))).bind("void_return"), + this); +} + +void ReturnExpressionInVoidFunctionCheck::check( + const MatchFinder::MatchResult &Result) { + const auto *VoidReturn = Result.Nodes.getNodeAs<ReturnStmt>("void_return"); + diag(VoidReturn->getBeginLoc(), "return statements should not return void"); ---------------- PiotrZSL wrote:
message could be better, to point out that that it's about returning void expression not, void type, maybe better that return statement in void function shouldn't have subexpression/value https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76249 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
