HighCommander4 wrote: > What about a slightly different take? What if in addition to adding > `clangdLanguages` (without HLSL) we also add `clangdExperimentalFeatures` and > add `HLSL` there. The problem I'm trying to solve here is to avoid someone > enabling HLSL on a language server that doesn't advertise that it has support.
That sounds fine to me! https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75633 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
