================ @@ -1,39 +0,0 @@ -; Do setup work for all below tests: generate bitcode and combined index ---------------- MaskRay wrote:
It looks like that we had 3 precanned profraw files and this patch is adding another one. Since the raw profile isn't stable, this is going to add some inconvenience whenever the version is bumped. `thinlto_indirect_call_promotion.profraw` probably should be rewritten as `.proftext` and `llvm-profdata merge` ``` % fd -e profraw Transforms/PGOProfile/Inputs/thinlto_indirect_call_promotion.profraw tools/llvm-profdata/Inputs/basic.profraw tools/llvm-profdata/Inputs/compressed.profraw tools/llvm-profdata/Inputs/c-general.profraw ``` It seems that there is an earlier comment that proftext may not cover the use case well, so we also utilize a runtime test in `compiler-rt/test`. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74008 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
