================
@@ -343,6 +347,15 @@ public:
return __data_[__idx];
}
+# if _LIBCPP_STD_VER >= 26
+ _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI constexpr reference at(size_type __idx) const {
+ if (__idx >= size()) {
+ __throw_out_of_range();
+ }
+ return *(data() + __idx);
----------------
H-G-Hristov wrote:
I already renamed the arg as you suggested but in the synopsis both methods
would be using `idx`
```c++
constexpr reference operator[](size_type idx) const;
constexpr reference at(size_type idx) const;
```
Would it make sense to also rename the arg of `operator[]` for consistency?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74994
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
