https://github.com/preames created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74889
d80e46d added support for the target function attribute. However, it turns out
that commit has a nasty bug/oversight. As the tests in that revision show,
everything works if clang -cc1 is directly invoked. I was suprised to learn
this morning that compiling with clang (i.e. the typical user workflow) did not
work.
The bug is that if a set of explicit negative extensions is passed to cc1 at
the command line (as the clang driver always does), we were copying these
negative extensions to the end of the rewritten extension list. When this was
later parsed, this had the effect of turning back off any extension that the
target attribute had enabled.
This patch updates the logic to only propagate the features from the input
which don't appear in the rewritten form in either positive or negative form.
Note that this code structure is still highly suspect. In particular I'm
fairly sure that mixing extension versions with this code will result in odd
results. However, I figure its better to have something which mostly works
than something which doesn't work at all.
>From 65707b837a8bb7283896d2c9d4933a17e02a20b9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Philip Reames <prea...@rivosinc.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2023 12:49:58 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] [RISCV] Enable target attribute when invoked through clang
driver
d80e46d added support for the target function attribute. However,
it turns out that commit has a nasty bug/oversight. As the tests
in that revision show, everything works if clang -cc1 is directly
invoked. I was suprised to learn this morning that compiling with
clang (i.e. the typical user workflow) did not work.
The bug is that if a set of explicit negative extensions is passed
to cc1 at the command line (as the clang driver always does), we
were copying these negative extensions to the end of the rewritten
extension list. When this was later parsed, this had the effect of
turning back off any extension that the target attribute had enabled.
This patch updates the logic to only propagate the features from
the input which don't appear in the rewritten form in either
positive or negative form.
Note that this code structure is still highly suspect. In particular
I'm fairly sure that mixing extension versions with this code will
result in odd results. However, I figure its better to have something
which mostly works than something which doesn't work at all.
---
clang/lib/Basic/Targets/RISCV.cpp | 15 +++++++++----
.../CodeGen/RISCV/riscv-func-attr-target.c | 21 ++++++++++---------
2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/clang/lib/Basic/Targets/RISCV.cpp
b/clang/lib/Basic/Targets/RISCV.cpp
index 13f934e9947212..184176c05da23b 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Basic/Targets/RISCV.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Basic/Targets/RISCV.cpp
@@ -304,11 +304,18 @@ bool RISCVTargetInfo::initFeatureMap(
// RISCVISAInfo makes implications for ISA features
std::vector<std::string> ImpliedFeatures = (*ParseResult)->toFeatureVector();
- // Add non-ISA features like `relax` and `save-restore` back
- for (const std::string &Feature : NewFeaturesVec)
- if (!llvm::is_contained(ImpliedFeatures, Feature))
- ImpliedFeatures.push_back(Feature);
+ // parseFeatures normalizes the feature set by dropping any explicit
+ // negatives, and non-extension features. We need to preserve the later
+ // for correctness and want to preserve the former for consistency.
+ for (auto &Feature : NewFeaturesVec) {
+ StringRef ExtName = Feature;
+ assert(ExtName.size() > 1 && (ExtName[0] == '+' || ExtName[0] == '-'));
+ ExtName = ExtName.drop_front(1); // Drop '+' or '-'
+ if (!llvm::is_contained(ImpliedFeatures, ("+" + ExtName).str()) &&
+ !llvm::is_contained(ImpliedFeatures, ("-" + ExtName).str()))
+ ImpliedFeatures.push_back(Feature);
+ }
return TargetInfo::initFeatureMap(Features, Diags, CPU, ImpliedFeatures);
}
diff --git a/clang/test/CodeGen/RISCV/riscv-func-attr-target.c
b/clang/test/CodeGen/RISCV/riscv-func-attr-target.c
index 74bc5f2ac70492..506acaba687417 100644
--- a/clang/test/CodeGen/RISCV/riscv-func-attr-target.c
+++ b/clang/test/CodeGen/RISCV/riscv-func-attr-target.c
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
// REQUIRES: riscv-registered-target
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple riscv64 -target-feature +zifencei -target-feature
+m \
-// RUN: -target-feature +a -target-feature +save-restore \
+// RUN: -target-feature +a -target-feature +save-restore -target-feature -zbb
\
+// RUN: -target-feature -relax -target-feature -zfa \
// RUN: -emit-llvm %s -o - | FileCheck %s
// CHECK-LABEL: define dso_local void @testDefault
@@ -35,12 +36,12 @@ testAttrFullArchAndAttrCpu() {}
__attribute__((target("cpu=sifive-u54"))) void testAttrCpuOnly() {}
//.
-// CHECK: attributes #0 = {
{{.*}}"target-features"="+64bit,+a,+m,+save-restore,+zifencei" }
-// CHECK: attributes #1 = { {{.*}}"target-cpu"="rocket-rv64"
"target-features"="+64bit,+a,+d,+f,+m,+save-restore,+v,+zicsr,+zifencei,+zve32f,+zve32x,+zve64d,+zve64f,+zve64x,+zvl128b,+zvl32b,+zvl64b"
"tune-cpu"="generic-rv64" }
-// CHECK: attributes #2 = {
{{.*}}"target-features"="+64bit,+a,+m,+save-restore,+zbb,+zifencei" }
-// CHECK: attributes #3 = {
{{.*}}"target-features"="+64bit,+a,+d,+experimental-zicond,+f,+m,+save-restore,+v,+zbb,+zicsr,+zifencei,+zve32f,+zve32x,+zve64d,+zve64f,+zve64x,+zvl128b,+zvl32b,+zvl64b"
}
-// CHECK: attributes #4 = {
{{.*}}"target-features"="+64bit,+a,+c,+d,+f,+m,+save-restore,+zbb,+zicsr,+zifencei"
}
-// CHECK: attributes #5 = { {{.*}}"target-features"="+64bit,+m,+save-restore" }
-// CHECK: attributes #6 = { {{.*}}"target-cpu"="sifive-u54"
"target-features"="+64bit,+a,+m,+save-restore,+zbb,+zifencei" }
-// CHECK: attributes #7 = { {{.*}}"target-cpu"="sifive-u54"
"target-features"="+64bit,+m,+save-restore" }
-// CHECK: attributes #8 = { {{.*}}"target-cpu"="sifive-u54"
"target-features"="+64bit,+a,+c,+d,+f,+m,+save-restore,+zicsr,+zifencei" }
+// CHECK: attributes #0 = {
{{.*}}"target-features"="+64bit,+a,+m,+save-restore,+zifencei,-relax,-zbb,-zfa"
}
+// CHECK: attributes #1 = { {{.*}}"target-cpu"="rocket-rv64"
"target-features"="+64bit,+a,+d,+f,+m,+save-restore,+v,+zicsr,+zifencei,+zve32f,+zve32x,+zve64d,+zve64f,+zve64x,+zvl128b,+zvl32b,+zvl64b,-relax,-zbb,-zfa"
"tune-cpu"="generic-rv64" }
+// CHECK: attributes #2 = {
{{.*}}"target-features"="+64bit,+a,+m,+save-restore,+zbb,+zifencei,-relax,-zfa"
}
+// CHECK: attributes #3 = {
{{.*}}"target-features"="+64bit,+a,+d,+experimental-zicond,+f,+m,+save-restore,+v,+zbb,+zicsr,+zifencei,+zve32f,+zve32x,+zve64d,+zve64f,+zve64x,+zvl128b,+zvl32b,+zvl64b,-relax,-zfa"
}
+// CHECK: attributes #4 = {
{{.*}}"target-features"="+64bit,+a,+c,+d,+f,+m,+save-restore,+zbb,+zicsr,+zifencei,-relax,-zfa"
}
+// CHECK: attributes #5 = {
{{.*}}"target-features"="+64bit,+m,+save-restore,-relax,-zbb,-zfa" }
+// CHECK: attributes #6 = { {{.*}}"target-cpu"="sifive-u54"
"target-features"="+64bit,+a,+m,+save-restore,+zbb,+zifencei,-relax,-zfa" }
+// CHECK: attributes #7 = { {{.*}}"target-cpu"="sifive-u54"
"target-features"="+64bit,+m,+save-restore,-relax,-zbb,-zfa" }
+// CHECK: attributes #8 = { {{.*}}"target-cpu"="sifive-u54"
"target-features"="+64bit,+a,+c,+d,+f,+m,+save-restore,+zicsr,+zifencei,-relax,-zbb,-zfa"
}
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
