efriedma-quic wrote:

My primary concerns here are:
- It being likely these builtins will be superseded by something else once 
someone else tries to standardize this.  Maybe this isn't a big deal... but 
maybe we want to choose names that are less likely to overlap with stuff anyone 
else is doing.
- We should try to avoid new preprocessor macros if possible; these are going 
to get unconditionally injected into every translation unit anyone ever builds 
with clang in any language mode, so we want to try to avoid extending the 
number of macros we define where possible.

That said, I don't want to block progress here; this is clearly important 
functionality to have.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72280
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to