Endilll wrote: > I could nit on the naming conventions here or there, but I think this overall > is such a vast improvement that I'd rather get 'this', then argue on names in > future files, and let this one lie.
@erichkeane Now is the best time to bring those nits on, unless you want changes in C++ code (this is out of scope of this PR and my current efforts, which is focused on `expected` directives). I've been striking balance with both `-verify` prefixes naming and `#marker` names, so I'm very open to input on those names. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73879 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
