================
@@ -14240,6 +14294,114 @@ StmtResult Sema::ActOnCXXForRangeIdentifier(Scope *S,
SourceLocation IdentLoc,
: IdentLoc);
}
+static ImplicitConversionKind getConversionKind(QualType FromType,
+ QualType ToType) {
+ if (ToType->isIntegerType()) {
+ if (FromType->isComplexType())
+ return ICK_Complex_Real;
+ if (FromType->isFloatingType())
+ return ICK_Floating_Integral;
+ if (FromType->isIntegerType())
+ return ICK_Integral_Conversion;
+ }
+
+ if (ToType->isFloatingType()) {
+ if (FromType->isComplexType())
+ return ICK_Complex_Real;
+ if (FromType->isFloatingType())
+ return ICK_Floating_Conversion;
+ if (FromType->isIntegerType())
+ return ICK_Floating_Integral;
+ }
+
+ return ICK_Identity;
+}
----------------
Fznamznon wrote:
> I wonder if we should expose (some of) the logic of IsStandardConversion()
> from SemaOverload.cpp
You mean part starting from
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/af65379e383bac651f0868237e9086630b15ee0d/clang/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp#L2074
?
If yes, how this will help better with the problem of adding new conversions?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73099
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
