dwblaikie wrote: > I.e., two `DIGlobalVariableExpression`s for the same `DIGlobalVariable`, > which AFAICT would confuse `DwarfDebug` at the moment, which expects there to > be a 1-to-1 mapping.
Would confuse `DwarfDebug` without your changes/this patch? Or only with this patch? (& hopefully there's some way to reach the merge globals functionality/problem/interesting IR from clang itself - but I guess even if it isn't, this is still a demonstration of representational issues) https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72730 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
