=?utf-8?q?Björn?= Svensson <bjorn.a.svens...@est.tech>
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To: <llvm.org/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73...@github.com>


https://github.com/PiotrZSL commented:

Looks fine, as we got already such checks that are and are not aliases.
But consider doing this as an actually separate check instead of using an alias 
functionality.
Simply change original check, add other constructor, split storeOptions method, 
so in this check list of functions would not be configurable by end user.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73119
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to