efriedma-quic wrote: > The underlying implementation is a string literal in the LLVM syncscope > argument, but the problem is that this isn't standardized at all and varies > between backends potentially
We don't have to use the same set of strings as syncscope if that doesn't make sense. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72280 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
