bogner wrote:

> Its a bit of a shame that the `VariadicEnumArgument` isn't being included 
> here/updated here, I typically appreciate the variadic versions being kept in 
> sync. But since we don't have a use for it at the moment, I think a 'fixme' 
> (or a future patch!) would be acceptable.

It was pretty straightforward, so I updated VariadicEnumArgument as well 
(though it is unfortunate that it isn't tested at all since it isn't used with 
an external enum)

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70835
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to