dwblaikie wrote: > Should not we remove constant initializer from the type definition if we have > a DW_TAG_variable with a DW_AT_const_value now?
Yep, +1 to this. This is where the type normalization benefit would come from - no longer having this const value on the member declaration, but only on the definition. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70639 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
