=?utf-8?b?5YiY6Zuo5Z+5?= <[email protected]>
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To: <llvm/llvm-project/pull/69075/[email protected]>
================
@@ -354,10 +354,10 @@ UnresolvedLookupExpr::UnresolvedLookupExpr(
NestedNameSpecifierLoc QualifierLoc, SourceLocation TemplateKWLoc,
const DeclarationNameInfo &NameInfo, bool RequiresADL, bool Overloaded,
const TemplateArgumentListInfo *TemplateArgs, UnresolvedSetIterator Begin,
- UnresolvedSetIterator End)
+ UnresolvedSetIterator End, bool KnownDependent)
: OverloadExpr(UnresolvedLookupExprClass, Context, QualifierLoc,
- TemplateKWLoc, NameInfo, TemplateArgs, Begin, End, false,
- false, false),
+ TemplateKWLoc, NameInfo, TemplateArgs, Begin, End,
+ KnownDependent, false, false),
----------------
shafik wrote:
`/*KnownInstantiationDependent=*/false,
/*KnownContainsUnexpandedParameterPack=*/false`
to be consistent with
[bugprone-argument-comment](https://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/bugprone/argument-comment.html)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69075
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits