Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= <tbae...@redhat.com>,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= <tbae...@redhat.com>,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= <tbae...@redhat.com>,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= <tbae...@redhat.com>,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= <tbae...@redhat.com>,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= <tbae...@redhat.com>,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= <tbae...@redhat.com>,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= <tbae...@redhat.com>,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= <tbae...@redhat.com>,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= <tbae...@redhat.com>,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= <tbae...@redhat.com>,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= <tbae...@redhat.com>,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= <tbae...@redhat.com>,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= <tbae...@redhat.com>,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= <tbae...@redhat.com>,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= <tbae...@redhat.com>,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= <tbae...@redhat.com>,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= <tbae...@redhat.com>,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= <tbae...@redhat.com>
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To: <llvm/llvm-project/pull/66514/cl...@github.com>


tbaederr wrote:

> > I've already switched to the max file size variant now, is that alright or 
> > do you want me to pursue the checkpoint version again?
> 
> Oh wow, there was a failure of communication somewhere. Having checkpoints, 
> AND disabling it entirely for large files is what i thought we were going to 
> do.

No, my point was that we can do it for "small" (but actually large) source 
files in a few milliseconds per diagnostic, so not a problem, but for larger 
files (generated or from a unity build) files, it might become too slow. So if 
we just limit ourselves to, let's say, 1MB files, then it's feasible. The 
implementation of this is easier, and, most importantly, it has no negative 
effect on lexing.

The check point approach makes regular lexing slower - even if we reserve the 
1000 checkpoints as you mentioned, we still add more overhead for ever token we 
lex (how much overhead depends of course).

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66514
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to