github-actions[bot] wrote:
<!--LLVM CODE FORMAT COMMENT: {clang-format}-->
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
<details>
<summary>
You can test this locally with the following command:
</summary>
``````````bash
git-clang-format --diff 25da9bb7d44c91b0339382af6c91b6a346685212
d44be70de99dfbe00ea2dc366222a797ca92d9d5 --
clang/lib/AST/Interp/ByteCodeExprGen.cpp clang/test/AST/Interp/cxx20.cpp
``````````
</details>
<details>
<summary>
View the diff from clang-format here.
</summary>
``````````diff
diff --git a/clang/lib/AST/Interp/ByteCodeExprGen.cpp
b/clang/lib/AST/Interp/ByteCodeExprGen.cpp
index 5dde2d52e717..056d85facb68 100644
--- a/clang/lib/AST/Interp/ByteCodeExprGen.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/AST/Interp/ByteCodeExprGen.cpp
@@ -817,13 +817,14 @@ bool ByteCodeExprGen<Emitter>::VisitArrayInitLoopExpr(
assert(Initializing);
assert(!DiscardResult);
- // Make sure the common expression is evaluated, and the result is cached in
the current scope.
+ // Make sure the common expression is evaluated, and the result is cached in
+ // the current scope.
{
OptionScope<Emitter> Scope(this, /*NewDiscardResult=*/true,
- /*NewInitializing=*/false);
+ /*NewInitializing=*/false);
this->VisitOpaqueValueExpr(E->getCommonExpr());
}
-
+
// TODO: This compiles to quite a lot of bytecode if the array is larger.
// Investigate compiling this to a loop.
const Expr *SubExpr = E->getSubExpr();
@@ -881,7 +882,7 @@ bool ByteCodeExprGen<Emitter>::VisitOpaqueValueExpr(const
OpaqueValueExpr *E) {
// Here the local variable is created but the value is removed from the
stack,
// so we put it back if the caller needs it.
- if(!DiscardResult) {
+ if (!DiscardResult) {
if (!this->emitGetLocal(SubExprT, *LocalIndex, E))
return false;
}
``````````
</details>
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67886
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
