Endilll wrote: > which brings up an additional concern/thing to deal with for the non_storable > attribute (that is, do we apply it to assignments? how about > exact-assignments like you've done there?).
Conservative approach would be to issue diagnostics based on `non_storable` only when LHS of assignment was checked taking it into account. In other words, LHS is a bit-field with `preferred_type`, so `non_storable` enumerator was excluded when computing how many bits are required to store the enum. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69104 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
