================ @@ -0,0 +1,65 @@ +// RUN: rm -rf %t +// RUN: mkdir %t +// RUN: split-file %s %t + +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 -emit-obj -fmodules -fimplicit-module-maps -fmodules-cache-path=%t %t/main.cpp -o %t/main.o + +//--- V.h +#ifndef V_H +#define V_H + +class A { +public: + constexpr A() { } + constexpr ~A() { } +}; + +template <typename T> +class V { +public: + V() = default; + + constexpr V(int n, const A& a = A()) {} +}; + +#endif + +//--- inst1.h +#include "V.h" + +static void inst1() { + V<int> v; +} + +//--- inst2.h +#include "V.h" + +static void inst2() { + V<int> v(100); +} + +//--- module.modulemap +module "M" { ---------------- vgvassilev wrote:
Is that the new standard nowadays? Can we use `#pragma clang module build` and alike to express the module setup? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69076 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits