arichardson wrote: > > Since the langref definition is based on GEP, can we use index width > > instead of pointer width? If you disagree with this, it would still be good > > if you could add a test where the datalayout has index width < pointer > > width to show the current semantics. > > Any target inmind? But I think ptrwidth makes more sense given that the > result is a pointer. It would be awkward to have resize things like knownbits > / etc... and would somewhat make ptrmask useless as basically any mask would > result in a low-bit only pointer.
Since this is target-independent I was just thinking using something like `-p1:64:64:64:32` for a 64-bit size pointer with 32-bit address range (which would match CHERI on 32-bit systems). In-tree I see AMDGPU has `-p7:160:256:256:32`. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67166 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
