cor3ntin wrote:

> I agree with your analysis in "Unchanged" section. As for [P2460R2 Relax 
> requirements on wchar_t to match existing 
> practices](https://wg21.link/p2460r2), it indeed seem like a pure wording 
> change, but I'm not sure as well. Maybe @cor3ntin has an opinion on this.

Yes. It allows UTF-16 as wchar_t encoding, which has been status quo on windows 
(including clang cl) for over 2 decades,
but the standard did not recognize that behavior as conforming.


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68846
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to