================ @@ -236,6 +236,7 @@ FEATURE(shadow_call_stack, FEATURE(tls, PP.getTargetInfo().isTLSSupported()) FEATURE(underlying_type, LangOpts.CPlusPlus) FEATURE(experimental_library, LangOpts.ExperimentalLibrary) +FEATURE(datasizeof, LangOpts.CPlusPlus) ---------------- AaronBallman wrote:
Oh my. That behavior makes sense, but is really not helpful in this case. You could use compiler version macro checks instead of `__has_extension`. That's pretty gross and likely easy to forget, but would it be a viable workaround? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67805 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
