ProExpertProg added a comment. Is there an update on this? I agree adding a flag to control this behavior would be good but the Google style guide clearly does not take the `explicit(false)` option into consideration. Currently the only alternatives are a disabling the check completely or adding a bunch of NOLINT statements everywhere, neither of which is great.
Perhaps an alternative would be to add a separate check, either called `explicit-constructor` or `google-explicit-constructor-permissive` with this functionality. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D117593/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D117593 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
