================
@@ -274,20 +274,27 @@ class DefaultIntArgument<string name, int default> :
IntArgument<name, 1> {
}
// This argument is more complex, it includes the enumerator type name,
-// a list of strings to accept, and a list of enumerators to map them to.
-class EnumArgument<string name, string type, list<string> values,
+// a list of possible values, and a list of enumerators to map them to.
+class EnumArgument<string name, string type, bit is_string, list<string>
values,
----------------
erichkeane wrote:
I think rather than splitting this into doing 2 things, we should instead have
an `UnevaluatedStringArgument` type here.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68550
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
