================
@@ -753,32 +756,16 @@ void GenericTaintChecker::initTaintRules(CheckerContext 
&C) const {
       {{{"execvp"}}, TR::Sink({{0, 1}}, MsgSanitizeSystemArgs)},
       {{{"execvpe"}}, TR::Sink({{0, 1, 2}}, MsgSanitizeSystemArgs)},
       {{{"dlopen"}}, TR::Sink({{0}}, MsgSanitizeSystemArgs)},
-      {{CDF_MaybeBuiltin, {{"malloc"}}}, TR::Sink({{0}}, 
MsgTaintedBufferSize)},
-      {{CDF_MaybeBuiltin, {{"calloc"}}}, TR::Sink({{0}}, 
MsgTaintedBufferSize)},
-      {{CDF_MaybeBuiltin, {{"alloca"}}}, TR::Sink({{0}}, 
MsgTaintedBufferSize)},
-      {{CDF_MaybeBuiltin, {{"memccpy"}}},
-       TR::Sink({{3}}, MsgTaintedBufferSize)},
-      {{CDF_MaybeBuiltin, {{"realloc"}}},
-       TR::Sink({{1}}, MsgTaintedBufferSize)},
+       // malloc, calloc, alloca, realloc, memccpy
+       // are intentionally left out as taint sinks
+       // because unconditional reporting for these functions
+       // generate many false positives.
----------------
DonatNagyE wrote:

```suggestion
       // generates many false positives.
```
(trivial grammar nitpick)

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68607
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to