================ @@ -92,6 +92,19 @@ INSTR_PROF_DATA(const uint16_t, Int16ArrayTy, NumValueSites[IPVK_Last+1], \ /* INSTR_PROF_DATA end. */ +#ifndef INSTR_PROF_VTABLE_DATA +#define INSTR_PROF_VTABLE_DATA(Type, LLVMType, Name, Initializer) +#else +#define INSTR_PROF_VTABLE_DATA_DEFINED +#endif +INSTR_PROF_VTABLE_DATA(const uint64_t, llvm::Type::getInt64Ty(Ctx), VTableNameHash, \ + ConstantInt::get(llvm::Type::getInt64Ty(Ctx), IndexedInstrProf::ComputeHash(VTableName))) +INSTR_PROF_VTABLE_DATA(const IntPtrT, llvm::Type::getInt8PtrTy(Ctx), VTablePointer, VTableAddr) +INSTR_PROF_VTABLE_DATA(const uint32_t, llvm::Type::getInt32Ty(Ctx), VTableSize, \ ---------------- minglotus-6 wrote:
yes, recording the beginning and end of the vtable addresses helps mapping instrumented addresses (which is in the middle more accurately) https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66825 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
