DonatNagyE wrote: > No-no, I mean whatever I said in the next sentence, like literally the same > buffer, not the same allocation site, not the same variable, but literally > the same allocation, except it has multiple size-aware operations performed > on it, [...]
Thanks for the clarification! I agree with your examples and that behavior can be achieved via the solutions that I suggested (the separate patches for the `malloc` and `memcpy` function families) . https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67352 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
