AaronBallman wrote: > > runtime, whereas a `consteval` one cannot. WDYT? > > This makes sense to me. Also, see my comment on #67376. It looks like someone > else is messing with this area as well, and are editing things in an > incompatible way, so we should make sure that these don't conflict.
Good catch -- I think it would make sense to land these changes here first and then rebase on top of it, because this is generalizing the existing code in a way that should make it slightly easier to handle template instantiations (and hopefully handle them for `constructor`, `destructor`, and `init_priority` at the same time). https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67360 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
