MaskRay added a comment. > So this is truly a test of the ld.otherlinker feature pattern, not some > special case driver feature. I guess we should leave the test alone. > Closing, we left the test alone, it still uses -fuse-ld=lld-link2. Perhaps in > the future we should reconsider this, but that's how things stand now, and we > aren't going to land this patch as is. + @MaskRay , who has thought about > -fuse-ld= semantics.
Yes, we can leave the test alone. The `ld.<name>` convention is mainly for ELF. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D69763/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D69763 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
