EricWF commandeered this revision. EricWF edited reviewers, added: zoecarver; removed: EricWF. EricWF added a comment. Herald added a reviewer: libc++. Herald added a project: All.
In D69062#1711610 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D69062#1711610>, @ldionne wrote: > If we want to mark the LWG issue as being resolved for libc++, I think the > test should be moved to the libc++ test suite. Otherwise, we're only > assessing that libc++ implements LWG2426 __on Clang__. I don't agree. Clang implements this behavior, the fact that C++ chose to put std::atomic in the library rather than the language has more to do with C++ and less to do with implementation responsibility. If making changes to libc++ won't change the output of this test, then having the test doesn't matter. I've marked the LWG issue as complete in a separate commit, and I'm going to close this now. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D69062/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D69062 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits