================
@@ -24790,8 +24790,8 @@ static SDValue LowerVACOPY(SDValue Op, const 
X86Subtarget &Subtarget,
   return DAG.getMemcpy(
       Chain, DL, DstPtr, SrcPtr,
       DAG.getIntPtrConstant(Subtarget.isTarget64BitLP64() ? 24 : 16, DL),
-      Align(Subtarget.isTarget64BitLP64() ? 8 : 4), /*isVolatile*/ false, 
false,
-      false, MachinePointerInfo(DstSV), MachinePointerInfo(SrcSV));
+      Align(Subtarget.isTarget64BitLP64() ? 8 : 4), /*Vol=*/{false, false},
----------------
RKSimon wrote:

For understandability, should we use a MemTransferVolatility builder helper 
instead of embedding implicit values like this?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65748
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to