adriannistor wrote: @carlosgalvezp @PiotrZSL @Xazax-hun @EugeneZelenko
Thank you for your feedback! I appreciate the time you spent on this PR! After discussion in our team based on the feedback in this PR, our current plan is to develop the check to a more mature shape and then upstream it here (i.e., to not pursue the current approach of upstreaming the checker as we develop it, in many PRs). This approach will address the feedback in this PR, e.g., clarify the differences to the existing checker, bring the check's (high level and low level) requirements to a more stable shape, etc. Based on the above, I will close this PR. I will get back in touch when we are ready with the more stable version! Thank you! Adrian https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65189 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
