jpienaar added a comment.
Cool. I didn't know the review system allows having the patch updated like this
:) It still reports me as the author and you as a subscriber. I don't think
that matters.
================
Comment at: lib/Target/NVPTX/NVPTXISelLowering.cpp:1033
@@ +1032,3 @@
+ const DataLayout &DL) const {
+ if (CS) {
+ unsigned Align = 0;
----------------
There is a preference to early exits. So perhaps:
if (!CS)
return DL.getABITTypeAlignment(Ty);
================
Comment at: lib/Target/NVPTX/NVPTXISelLowering.cpp:1131
@@ -1128,3 +1130,3 @@
- unsigned align = getArgumentAlignment(Callee, CS, Ty, paramCount + 1);
+ unsigned align = getArgumentAlignment(Callee, CS, Ty, paramCount + 1,
DL);
// declare .param .align <align> .b8 .param<n>[<size>];
----------------
Move this to a new line to avoid exceeding 80 chars.
There are a couple of other formatting changes needed to. The simplest way is
to use clang-format. To have the changes you added reformatted you could use
clang-format-diff.py:
svn diff --diff-cmd=diff -x-U0 |
./tools/clang/tools/clang-format/clang-format-diff.py
================
Comment at: test/CodeGen/NVPTX/zero-cs.ll:1
@@ +1,2 @@
+; RUN: not llc < %s -march=nvptx 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
+
----------------
Could you add a comment explaining what this test is testing?
So this test case would fail previously (dereference null pointer) and now pass
(return error)?
https://reviews.llvm.org/D9168
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
