================ @@ -1016,6 +1016,14 @@ TEST_F(TokenAnnotatorTest, UnderstandsRequiresClausesAndConcepts) { ASSERT_EQ(Tokens.size(), 22u) << Tokens; EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[4], tok::kw_requires, TT_RequiresClause); EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[10], tok::ampamp, TT_PointerOrReference); + + Tokens = annotate("void f() & requires(true) {}"); + EXPECT_EQ(Tokens.size(), 12u) << Tokens; + EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[4], tok::amp, TT_PointerOrReference); + + Tokens = annotate("void f() & requires(C<true, true>) {}"); + EXPECT_EQ(Tokens.size(), 17u) << Tokens; + EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[4], tok::amp, TT_PointerOrReference); } ---------------- HazardyKnusperkeks wrote:
Just to be sure, can you add a test with a requires expression like ``` c++ requires(C<true, true> c) { { c.foo(); } } ``` https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65908 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits