benlangmuir added a comment.

Other than the giant header in the test we're still discussing, this basically 
LGTM.



================
Comment at: clang/test/Modules/Inputs/System/usr/include/stdint.h:2
 typedef int my_awesome_nonstandard_integer_type;
+
+/* C99 7.18.1.1 Exact-width integer types.
----------------
iana wrote:
> iana wrote:
> > benlangmuir wrote:
> > > Why do we need all this code now (I assume this is copied from the real 
> > > header)?
> > It's to support the tests I added to Modules/compiler_builtins.m. 
> > stdatomic.h and inttypes.h rely on stdint.h contents from the C library, 
> > and on complex.h and inttypes.h and math.h being present. I could just test 
> > the modules with `-ffreestanding` I think, would that be better?
> (and yes I just copied it from the builtin header)
I'm not sure what the best approach is here, but this seems heavy for a test.  
Do we expect to need to keep this up to date? If so maybe ffreestanding for the 
specific test cases this affects would be a better tradeoff.  Maybe someone 
else has a suggestion here


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D159064/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D159064

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to