enh added inline comments.

================
Comment at: compiler-rt/lib/builtins/cpu_model.c:1382
+    return;
+#if defined(__ANDROID__)
+  // ifunc resolvers don't have hwcaps in arguments on Android API lower
----------------
ilinpv wrote:
> MaskRay wrote:
> > I am unfamiliar with how Android ndk builds compiler-rt.
> > 
> > If `__ANDROID_API__ >= 30`, shall we use the regular Linux code path?
> I think that leads to shipping different compile-rt libraries depend on 
> ANDROID_API. If this is an option to consider than runtime check 
> android_get_device_api_level() < 30 can be replaced by `__ANDROID_API__ < 30`
depends what you mean... in 10 years or so, yes, no-one is likely to still care 
about the older API levels and we can just delete this. but until then, no, 
there's _one_ copy of compiler-rt that everyone uses, and although _OS 
developers_ don't need to support anything more than a couple of years old, 
most app developers are targeting far lower API levels than that (to maximize 
the number of possible customers).

TL;DR: "you could add that condition to the `#if`, but no-one would use it for 
a decade". (and i think the comment and `if` below should make it clear enough 
to future archeologists when this code block can be removed :-) )


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D158641/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D158641

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to