MaskRay added a comment. In D158461#4605084 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D158461#4605084>, @brad wrote:
> Isn't there more than this to do a full proper removal? > > Looking around it looks like the Ananas and Contiki support can be removed. > Ananas used > to use Clang but switched back to GCC and the bits there are not maintained. > The Contiki > support never went anywhere. I agree that Contiki should be removed. The code doesn't even constitute a partial port. It just enables safestack, but this doesn't really justify adding a new ToolChain. For Ananas, it looks like the author is quite responsive (D124729 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D124729>). But indeed, I don't know whether it is still working. It looks like Ananas switched from `crt0.o` to `crt1.o` but the code still uses `crt1.o` Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D158461/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D158461 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
