aaron.ballman added a comment. > I've seen a few similar patches from you @Manna and probably some related > folks. > Could you please clarify the motivation and the expectations? Or feel free to > point me to the Discuss post around the subject if I happened to miss it.
Intel has been addressing issues found by a static analysis tool and when we find the issue exists in community Clang, we address it upstream. Part of addressing the issue is figuring out whether the issue is actually a false positive or not; we try to limit the changes to only true positives (but some will sometimes slip through the cracks). I don't believe there's been a Discourse post on the topic as it's expected to be regular maintenance work instead of something special. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D158285/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D158285 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
