aaron.ballman added a comment. In D158242#4598692 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D158242#4598692>, @strimo378 wrote:
>> I'm wary of exposing internal LLVM implementation details through a >> user-facing attribute like this. > > @aaron.ballman That means you would be more open to an attribute like > `__attribute__((onedefinitionrule))` because it is part of the C++ standard? It depends entirely on what the attribute would do, how it is used in-tree, how users would use it, etc. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D158242/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D158242 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
