skan added inline comments.

================
Comment at: llvm/lib/Target/X86/MCTargetDesc/X86MCCodeEmitter.cpp:927
+      !STI.hasFeature(X86::FeatureAVX10_512bit))
+    report_fatal_error("ZMM registers are not supported without AVX10-512BIT");
   switch (TSFlags & X86II::OpPrefixMask) {
----------------
skan wrote:
> -mavx10.1 does not work for assembler. So if such instruction is generated 
> w/o AVX10-512BIT support, it must be compiler's issue instead of user's. An 
> `assert` should be more appropriate here.
> -mavx10.1 does not work for assembler. So if such instruction is generated 
> w/o AVX10-512BIT support, it must be compiler's issue instead of user's. An 
> `assert` should be more appropriate here.

Reference: https://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html#assert-liberally


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D157485/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D157485

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to