ZijunZhao added a comment. In D157331#4576540 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D157331#4576540>, @aaron.ballman wrote:
> In D157331#4575224 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D157331#4575224>, @ZijunZhao > wrote: > >> Another followup question: I check >> https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2683.pdf and I only add >> Core Proposal here. Do I need to add Supplemental Proposal, like some types? > > Ah, this is a bit confusing! tl;dr: No need to add the supplemental proposal. > > The way to trace this down yourself is: > > - The working draft > (https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n3096.pdf) has a list of > what papers were adopted and applied to the standard. You'll find N2683 under > the June 2021 virtual meeting heading. That's how you know which paper was > adopted. > - You can look at the paper to see the proposed wording, prior art, > motivation, etc. That gets you 95% of the way but you need to know what words > actually went into the standard. So use the original paper to give you ideas > on what to implement, what to test, etc, but verify against the wording in > the standard. > - Because this was discussed at the June 2021 virtual meeting, you should > look at those meeting minutes > (https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2802.pdf) to see what was > adopted. You can search for `2683` to find the relevant discussion in the > minutes. Most importantly, you can see what polls were taken. The two polls > of interest were: > > Straw Poll: Does the committee wish to adopt the Core proposal from N2683 > into C23? 13-0-5 Core proposal goes into C23. > Straw Poll: Does the committee want the "ckd_" identifiers from N2683's Core > proposal in future library directions to be potentially reserved identifiers? > 18-0-0 > > This is how we know that only the core proposal was added, and not the > supplemental proposal. Checking that belief against the standard wording > itself verifies that only the core proposal was added and the supplemental > bits are left out. > > (Hopefully that explanation makes some sense, but if you have more questions, > just ask!) Yes, that's very helpful! Thank you! Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D157331/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D157331 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
