aaron.ballman added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/test/SemaCXX/offsetof.cpp:106
+int x3[__builtin_offsetof(struct X2, X2::static_a) == 0 ? 1 : -1]; //
expected-error{{no member named 'static_a'}}
+int x4[__builtin_offsetof(struct X2, X2::X2) == 0 ? 1 : -1]; //
expected-error{{no member named 'X2'}}
+
----------------
yichi170 wrote:
> aaron.ballman wrote:
> > There's one more test I'd like to see:
> > ```
> > struct S {
> > int Foo;
> > };
> >
> > template <typename Ty>
> > void func() {
> > static_assert(__builtin_offsetof(Ty, Ty::Foo) == 0, "");
> > }
> >
> > void inst() {
> > func<S>();
> > }
> > ```
> It would get the compile error in the current patch, but I think it should be
> compiled without any error, right?
Correct, that should be accepted: https://godbolt.org/z/1f6a9Yaxa
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D157201/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D157201
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
